Ok, for this particular run of tests, I've created a 2 card bruiser deck using Pillar Luke Cage and Godhunter Beta Ray Bill in order to keep the PWR cost of the deck a nice clean tenth of my total ATK so that basically I can still maximize the number of attacks I can get in while testing, and not harm my valor gains for the war too drastically. So, I can think of no reason to not just keep this chart very VERY simple. I was originally just going to have a two row chart with a YES/NO counter essentially...but then, I might do a full 101 rows similar to my position tests...I don't know why. So we can see how many battles between each activation? I doubt we can gleam much from that information, but why not, right? Oh my...actually...I thought of something even better. Oversaturation of information! Too bad I only thought about it after a few battles...oh well!
Don't mind the red, it's simply to make activation battles a little more visually distinctive rather than just checking the column.
| Card 1 | Card 2 | CT? | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battle 1 | N | ||
| Battle 2 | N | ||
| Battle 3 | N | ||
| Battle 4 | N | ||
| Battle 5 | N | ||
| Battle 6 | N | ||
| Battle 7 | Y | ||
| Battle 8 | N | ||
| Battle 9 | N | ||
| Battle 10 | N | ||
| Battle 11 | Y | ||
| Battle 12 | N | ||
| Battle 13 | N | ||
| Battle 14 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 15 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 16 | 1 | 2 | Y |
| Battle 17 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 18 | 1 | 2 | Y |
| Battle 19 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 20 | N | ||
| Battle 21 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 22 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 23 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 24 | 1 | 2 | Y |
| Battle 25 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 26 | 1 | 2 | Y |
| Battle 27 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 28 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 29 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 30 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 31 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 32 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 33 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 34 | 1 | 2 | Y |
| Battle 35 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 36 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 37 | 1 | Y | |
| Battle 38 | 1 | Y | |
| Battle 39 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 40 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 41 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 42 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 43 | 0 | 0 | Y |
| Battle 44 | 1 | 2 | Y |
| Battle 45 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 46 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 47 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 48 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 49 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 50 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 51 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 52 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 53 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 54 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 55 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 56 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 57 | 1 | Y | |
| Battle 58 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 59 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 60 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 61 | 1 | Y | |
| Battle 62 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 63 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 64 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 65 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 66 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 67 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 68 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 69 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 70 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 71 | 1 | Y | |
| Battle 72 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 73 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 74 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 75 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 76 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 77 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 78 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 79 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 80 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 81 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 82 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 83 | N | ||
| Battle 84 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 85 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 86 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 87 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 88 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 89 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 90 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 91 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 92 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 93 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 94 | 1 | Y | |
| Battle 95 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 96 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 97 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 98 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 99 | 1 | N | |
| Battle 100 | 1 | 2 | N |
| Battle 101 | 1 | 2 | Y |
| Battle 102 | 1 | N |
So, 16 out of 102 battles the CT activated. 15.7% chances are not exactly stellar. XD